<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Microsoft ProClarity Analytics Server 6.3 SP2	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.microsoftpost.com/6180/microsoft-download/pas-63-sp2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.microsoftpost.com/6180/microsoft-download/pas-63-sp2/</link>
	<description>Recent Downloads and Articles from the Microsoft Download Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Janelle		</title>
		<link>https://www.microsoftpost.com/6180/microsoft-download/pas-63-sp2/#comment-843</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftpost.com/microsoft-download/pas-63-sp2/#comment-843</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does it fix the problem with auto-scaling? 

In ProClarity, I have a graph that looks at planned and actual Revenue across 12 months. The left axis scaling is set to auto. The auto-maximum works fine, but the auto-minimum always includes zero instead of &quot;auto-scaling&quot; to just below the data points.

As a result, my trend lines are squished at the top of the graph because they are only occurring between $650-$690 million, but the left axis beings at $0 and goes all the way to $700 million.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it fix the problem with auto-scaling? </p>
<p>In ProClarity, I have a graph that looks at planned and actual Revenue across 12 months. The left axis scaling is set to auto. The auto-maximum works fine, but the auto-minimum always includes zero instead of &#8220;auto-scaling&#8221; to just below the data points.</p>
<p>As a result, my trend lines are squished at the top of the graph because they are only occurring between $650-$690 million, but the left axis beings at $0 and goes all the way to $700 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Janelle		</title>
		<link>https://www.microsoftpost.com/6180/microsoft-download/pas-63-sp2/#comment-2179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftpost.com/microsoft-download/pas-63-sp2/#comment-2179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does it fix the problem with auto-scaling? 

In ProClarity, I have a graph that looks at planned and actual Revenue across 12 months. The left axis scaling is set to auto. The auto-maximum works fine, but the auto-minimum always includes zero instead of &quot;auto-scaling&quot; to just below the data points.

As a result, my trend lines are squished at the top of the graph because they are only occurring between $650-$690 million, but the left axis beings at $0 and goes all the way to $700 million.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it fix the problem with auto-scaling? </p>
<p>In ProClarity, I have a graph that looks at planned and actual Revenue across 12 months. The left axis scaling is set to auto. The auto-maximum works fine, but the auto-minimum always includes zero instead of &#8220;auto-scaling&#8221; to just below the data points.</p>
<p>As a result, my trend lines are squished at the top of the graph because they are only occurring between $650-$690 million, but the left axis beings at $0 and goes all the way to $700 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
